Nothing contained within it *CAN* be bullshit, or it couldn't go to publication.It's a partisan Democrat House run committee. The same partisans who have been accusing Trump of secretly being an ally of Putin and screeching to every news reporter that Trump needs to be impeached for treason.
So yes - it *CAN* be bullshit and still go to publication.
No. No it can’t.
The House Oversight Committee is a Bipartisan
Committee, with chairmanship under the ranking member of whichever party holds the majority in the House.
It is the main investigative committee in the House, and has the authority to investigate subjects within its legislative jurisdiction.
Whichever Party holds the Chairmanship of the Oversight Committee can decide what is investigated and when.According to the report itself
, staffers at the White House, Pentagon and elsewhere have been trying to get an Oversight Investigation going since early 2017.
But that investigation could never commence whilst the GOP held the majority in the House.
Now that the DNC controls the Oversight Committee agenda, the Committee will now investigate claims that the Trump Administration could be (deliberately or inadvertently) providing Saudi Arabia with the support and assistance it requires to build a nuclear weapon.
Maybe those claims are baseless.
Maybe the Trump Administration isn’t so irresponsible that it would risk allowing the nation that is the fountainhead of all Sunni Islamist radicalism and violence, to acquire nuclear weapons.
And if that is the case, the Oversight Committee will find it to be the case.
If it isn’t the case: the Oversight Committee will also hopefully establish that too.
What element of the above would you describe as “bullshit” Foota?
Anyone paying a lick of attention to the ME over the last 2 years knows that Trump (and Jared) have been trying to get Saudi Arabia and other Sunni nations (along with even Israel) to form a block against Iran, Syria and Russia who have been busy using chemical weapons on civilian centers and causing the biggest refugee crisis since WWII.
But that’s just plain wrong Foota.
Saudi Arabia and other Sunni nations (well, the UAE leastways) formed a block against Iran as soon as the Shia Revolution took place in 1979.
Iraq took point for the first 8 years, under the guidance and with the support of the U.S., naturally.
The 1990’s was the “Forgotten Decade”.
That is: the Decade we all forgot just how terrible and appalling the Iranians are, because the Cold War was over, the Soviet Union had collapsed, and all the carnage was taking place in the Balkans.
Then, in 2001, some of those forgotten Sunni allies, kicked off a decade-and-a-half of Sunni Terrorism.
And that was tricky…
Because the United States has been dependent on Saudi co-operation since 1971.
And even though it was fully understood that the financing and ideology behind the Muslamic Rape-Gangs was *ALL* coming from Saudi Arabia (and the UAE…)… We were supposed to ignore that.
Those Rape-Gangs were let loose in Syria (2011), because the U.S. wanted to topple Assad. And then they went off the reservation and set-up operations in Iraq as well (2014).
And for all of the Yazidis, Christians, Kurds and other demographics that suffered at the hands of ISIS, no group suffered more greatly than the Shia Muslim populations of Syria and Iraq.
The U.S. was never going to “crush ISIS”, until the objective of ousting Assad had been achieved.
So Syria asked Russia and Iran to do it (2015), and together, they did.
And now we have to go back to hating Shia Iran.
Israel and Saudi Arabia have hooked-up like the Lannisters and the Tyrells (and that won’t end well…) out of mutual hostility towards Iran. And they are only hostile towards Iran because it is a regional rival.
Israel attacks whatever other nations it feels like attacking, whenever it feels like attacking them.
And Saudi Arabia is following suit. Wanting to enjoy the same kind of diplomatic and moral freedoms that alliance with the U.S. grants Israel. They threaten and dominate their neighbours. All the time.
Why is the U.S. siding with them against Iran?